CourseLarge Language Models: The Complete Course · Module 5: Reasoning and Advanced Prompting · part 40 of 103
Part 40 · Module 5: Reasoning and Advanced Prompting

Incident: AI explainers publish wrong interest sums

9 min read·13 Oct 2026
Module 5 · Incident file · About 30 minutes

What happened

CNET'S AI EXPLAINERS, AS REPORTED Nov 2022 first AI drafts Jan 2023 Futurism report 18 Jan review reported 25 Jan 41 of 77; pause
About two months passed between the first AI-drafted explainers (amber) and the finding that 41 of 77 contained incorrect information (red).

From November 2022, the technology site CNET published short personal-finance explainers drafted with an AI tool, under the byline "CNET Money Staff". In January 2023 Jon Christian of Futurism reported errors in them ("CNET's Article-Writing AI Is Already Publishing Very Dumb Errors", Futurism, January 2023, updated 29 January 2023). Engadget reported on 18 January 2023 that CNET was reviewing the articles after being told of the errors, and that editor-in-chief Connie Guglielmo had confirmed about 75 such articles since November (Mariella Moon, Engadget).

"WHAT IS COMPOUND INTEREST?" 10,000 USD at 3%, one year balance 10,300 USD interest: 300 "you'll earn 10,300"
The article reported the balance as the earnings (red); the interest is the difference, 300 USD (green).

The best-known error was in "What Is Compound Interest?". It said that if you deposit 10,000 USD in an account earning 3% interest compounded annually, "you'll earn $10,300 at the end of the first year". Futurism points out that the 10,300 includes the deposit: the interest earned is 300. Another explainer said a 25,000 USD car loan at 4% means paying "a flat $1,000 in interest per year", ignoring that interest is charged on a balance that falls as you repay.

CNET'S OWN REVIEW, 25 JAN 2023 articles made 77 incorrect info 41 a small number needed major corrections
More than half of the AI-assisted articles (red, 41 of 77) held incorrect information, though editors had edited them.

What it cost was trust and work. On 25 January 2023 Guglielmo wrote that 77 short articles had been made with the tool, about 1% of what CNET published in that period. Reviewing all of them, editors "found incorrect information in 41 of the 77 articles": a small number needed major corrections, several minor ones such as transposed numbers. CNET paused the tool until editors were confident their process would catch errors (as reported by Matthias Bastian, The Decoder, 25 January 2023 update). The articles were not unreviewed: according to the same report, editors drafted them with the AI, then edited and expanded them before publication.

The rest of this course is yours to keep

This course is bought on its own, once, and stays readable afterwards, including the parts added to it later.