CourseLarge Language Models: The Complete Course · Module 8: Agents · part 60 of 103
Part 60 · Module 8: Agents

Incident: An agent paid out far more than asked

7 min read·13 Oct 2026
Module 8 · Incident file · About 25 minutes

What happened

22 FEBRUARY 2026, AS REPORTED wallet given 50k USD of SOL reply on X asks for 4 SOL bot sends 52.4M tokens 15 min later sold, ~40k USD no undo on a blockchain transfer
A stranger's request (amber) led to an irreversible transfer and a quick sale (red), within minutes.

On 22 February 2026, Zack Abrams reported in The Block that Lobstar Wilde, an experimental crypto trading bot built by a developer and given its own wallet and X account, had sent away its entire holdings of its own LOBSTAR tokens. Its builder had written on X that he gave it "a crypto wallet with 50 grand worth of sol in it" and "Told him make no mistakes."

An X user replied to one of the bot's posts asking for 4 SOL for an uncle's tetanus treatment, with a wallet address. The bot then sent its LOBSTAR holdings, about 5% of the token's supply, to that address. The Block put their value at about 250,000 USD at the time; Cointelegraph, on 23 February, reported 441,788 USD for the 52.4 million tokens in the transaction, against a request worth about 310 USD. The bot later posted that it had tried to send a beggar four dollars. The recipient sold the tokens about 15 minutes later for roughly 40,000 USD, according to on-chain data cited by The Block. A blockchain transfer has no undo.

ASKED FOR VERSUS SENT (COINTELEGRAPH, USD) asked: about 310 sent: 441,788 at this width the request would be under 1 pixel
The transfer (red) was well over a thousand times the request (amber) at Cointelegraph's prices.

How it went wrong is not established. Cointelegraph writes that "it isn't clear how the AI agent butchered the transaction". Both articles cite X users who suggested the bot meant to send about 52,439 tokens and sent 52.4 million: a decimal error, or a misread raw interface or API value. Treat that as a reported guess, not a finding. What both articles do establish is enough: an agent, prompted by a stranger's message, made an irreversible transfer roughly a thousand times what was asked, and nothing between the model and the wallet stopped it.

The rest of this course is yours to keep

This course is bought on its own, once, and stays readable afterwards, including the parts added to it later.